Modelica-Based Dynamic Analysis of an HTGR Combined Cycle System under Negative Reactivity Disturbance: Comparison of Constant-Pressure and Sliding-Pressure Operation

Authors

  • Haojie Qu Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power System and Equipment, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
  • Xinhe Qu Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China
  • Ming Ding Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power System and Equipment, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp223261

Keywords:

Modelica, HTGR, combined cycle, dynamic simulation, negative reactivity disturbance, constant-pressure operation, sliding-pressure operation

Abstract

Based on cascade energy utilization, a hightemperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) combined cycle offers an efficient energy conversion scheme, but its complex system configuration, strong parameter coupling, and dynamic response mechanisms require systematic analysis. In this paper, a dynamic model of an HTGR combined cycle system is developed in Modelica and validated by comparison with reference results. A negative reactivity disturbance of -300 pcm is then introduced to investigate the system transient response, with further comparison between constant-pressure and sliding-pressure operation. The results show that the steam generator heat-transfer rate decreases by 10.8% under sliding-pressure operation, less than the 15.1% decrease under constant-pressure operation, indicating better heat-transfer matching. However, steam turbine power decreases by 15.8%, compared with 3.8% under constant-pressure operation. Therefore, constantpressure operation is more suitable for maintaining main steam pressure and steam turbine power, whereas sliding-pressure operation is more appropriate for partial-load heat-transfer matching and load following.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-20